AI as My Biggest Critic

[t2van]

AI as My Biggest Critic

“This is not acceptable. We are not approving anything until I have clear, quantifiable answers to these questions. This document is meant…

medium.com

A good little read with an interesting prompt suggestion included. Talks about using AI to give you feedback on your work before you go submitting your idea so you can fix some upcoming questions or adjustments you may not have thought about.

I thought this bit was interesting:

This isn’t how “AI as a Critic” works however. This human touch, including validation and encouragement, is inherently absent in LLM-driven critique. If you ran one of the prompts I mentioned above, after multiple rounds of review, and even improving on what the LLM recommended, it will still find a way to criticize your work even if you addressed all of the points raised.

Because I think as people become more reliant on AI there will be a generation that will do nothing but fall back on it. So if they hit all points raised and get the AI to check it off, imagine you give that to your boss and then there is an issue, I'm not sure the person presenting the work could handle the human critic.

I think there has be a fine balance but looking how each generation coming up behind you gets more reliant on certain things, I think there social or personal interactions in a professional environment will become more awkward.