What do you think will be the next "nuclear bomb"

BulgarianDavid

New Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2026
Messages
3
Reaction Score
3
Feedback
0 / 0 / 0
There's a lot of talk about nukes in the news right now. Threats of nuclear bombs being used, nuclear facilities getting hit.

Assuming humanity progresses past this point and doesn't drop nukes on themselves, what do you think would come next as the world's next super weapon?

I've talked to some people who think it's going to be an antimatter bomb but I think it's going to be drone swarms since things look like they're headed in that direction more than an antimatter bomb.
 
Quiet weapons that kill without anyone noticing. It's possible, but futuristic. And it'll be real problem. ;)

Drones currently seem too loud to be good tool of perfect murder.
 
Who knows as long as we don't use weapons of mass destruction it's all good
 
I know, camouflaged drones.

A drone that looks like a part of grass, sits just there waiting for you to leave your house and then with one hit of laser takes you down. Could as well pretend to be a kitten or a nice girl.
 
I think that at some point the human race fucks up so bad that we will all be forced to realize as a collective that we're all better off stop trying to kill each other to try and please god.
 
I’ve heard that the current goal for modern warfare are drone swarms that use AI. A lot of people are worried that soon they’ll start using AI for targeting and attacks. There’s a chance that soon it won’t be people that are pulling the triggers…
 
I’ve heard that the current goal for modern warfare are drone swarms that use AI. A lot of people are worried that soon they’ll start using AI for targeting and attacks. There’s a chance that soon it won’t be people that are pulling the triggers…
Self replicating robots... cool concept to be executed against greedy corporations and just watch!
 
Hell yeah, nuke the fckn war mongers.
 

Illuminati Hoax? Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist​


'History is written by the victors' - Winston Churchill

IMG_2242.jpeg


"Ten countries in total have claimed to have nuclear weapons,
and this is actually the scary part of the hoax,
showing how major world governments collude."

Quite seriously, nuclear weapons have never existed.


Hiroshima and Nagasaki were only two more horrible urban napalm fire-bombings, less devastating in fact than the one that hit Tokyo five months earlier - but re-packaged with a fake story of a 'new awesome weapon'.

August 6 & 9, 1945 began the biggest hoax in history, helping oligarchs steal trillions from hapless taxpayers.

Before detailing how Hiroshima was a fraud, consider that the mushroom cloud we associate with 'nuclear blasts', is an ordinary result of chemical explosions, as you see in the above photos of when factories explode.

The old 'nuclear explosion' photos and films are often obviously fake when examined now with modern tools, mixing a chemical explosion image with a background.

The devastation you see in Hiroshima and Nagasaki - where indeed tens and hundreds of thousands died or were horrifically maimed - is exactly like in Tokyo or other Japanese firebombed cities, because houses were mostly wood.

Swedish engineer Anders Björkman, born 1946, has worked to expose the nuclear weapons hoax for years, arguing they are technically impossible. Björkman's website.

NAPALM

US & WW2 allies began chemical napalm attacks in July 1944 on Tinian Island but soon escalated to destroying entire cities, with the biggest killing over 100,000 and destroying 41 square kilometers of Tokyo on the night of 9-10 March 1945.

IMG_2243.jpeg


The horror of that Tokyo night seemed to make a great city just evaporate, emboldened the USA to pull off the nuclear weapons hoax, first with the 16 July 1945 'Trinity nuclear test explosion' and then the August 6 and 9 respective firebombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Alexander de Seversky (1894-1974), in youth an ace pilot for Russia's Tsarist Navy, emigrated to the US and became involved in military aviation there. He visited Hiroshima and Nagasaki shortly after the 'nuke blasts', talking to witnesses, and in a Reader's Digest article in February 1946 - let on between the lines that the 'nuclear weapons' were fake. He avoided saying so directly, but pointed out that, "To my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan." Directly under ground zero, Seversky saw "buildings structurally intact, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, railings, signs, and other comparatively fragile objects ... I could find no traces of unusual phenomena ... It simply is not true that matter was vapourised ... tree trunks and walls with growing vines disprove the claims of superheat ... it was fire, just fire, that took such high toll of life." http://www.heiwaco.com/bomb1.htm

German Jesuit Rev. John Siemens, an eye-witness in Hiroshima, documented local witnesses reporting multiple planes spreading incendiary material, the classical firebombing. Japanese survivor stories confirm as well that it was firebombing horror. However officially, Japan goes along with the nuke bomb hoax, as they must.

The smoking gun came a few years ago, when WW2 air combat logs were exposed, showing that on Hiroshima bombing day, a USA 66-aeroplane fleet - a typical size for urban napalm firebombing - was sent out to 'bomb Imabari Japan' that day. But tiny Imabari no longer existed, wiped out in two previous firebombing raids on 26 April and 8 May. This log entrycovered for the bombing fleet hitting Hiroshima about 55km away, a target which was not to be disclosed under penalty of death.


A 1990 medical study of Hiroshima-Nagasaki survivors and their descendants, found no noticeable genetic damage or cancer increases, etc., of the type we are led to expect from 'devastating nuclear bomb radiation'.


Illustrating how ridiculous 'nuclear weapons' became, here is an early 1960s video, of the US President's brother Robert Kennedy, viewing a 'nuclear weapons' blast whilst sitting a short distance downrange in a folding chair, watching detonation of the small 30kg or so 'nuclear bomb in an artillery shell', the 'Davy Crockett'

Ten countries in total have claimed to have nuclear weapons, and this is actually the scary part of the hoax, showing how major world governments collude. First to join was Stalin's Soviet Union, secretly propped up by the profit-seeking US military machine, which, as Antony Sutton exposed long ago, wished to have 'The Best Enemy Money Can Buy'. Here, briefly, the history of 'nuclear weapons' hoaxes:

1945 - USA HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS

1949 - COMMIE RUSSIA HAS THE BOMB, Soviet elites got permanent rewards for playing along

1952 - UK Brits & City of London don't want to be 2nd class - UK HAS THE BOMB

1960 - France chafes not to be 2nd class to Brits - FRANCE & DE GAULLE HAVE THE BOMB

1964 - China upgraded to major league - COMMIE CHINA HAS THE BOMB

1966 - Israel joins the club in time to blackmail Arabs in 1967 & 1973 wars - JEWS HAVE THE BOMB & ARE READY TO SAMSON OPTION EVERYBODY

1974 - India even gives joke name to its bomb program, 'Smiling Buddha' - INDIA HAS THE BOMB

1979 - South Africa's white apartheid gov gets to play - WHITE RACIST SOUTH AFRICA HAS THE BOMB READY TO KILL BLACK PEOPLE ... but 'dismantles bombs' before Mandela & black government can find out the scam

1998 - Pakistan becomes a player - PAKISTANI MUSLIMS HAVE THE BOMB & TERRORISTS MIGHT GET AHOLD OF IT

2006 - North Korea, always making deals, gets to upgrade - CRAZY NORTH KOREA HAS THE BOMB

As the New World Order looms, they have begun to wind down the hoax, the UN already working to 'abolish all nuclear weapons' ... The Pope will likely be in Jerusalem, smiling with pride about helping to eliminate, what never existed.

Article written in 2020

Post automatically merged:


Tl;dr

Certainly, nuclear power is real, as well as dangers of radioactive poisoning, etc, from things such as the 'depleted uranium' tank-piercing weapons made with by-products of nuclear fuel production. Nuclear 'testing' can be some combination of conventional explosives, chemicals, and nuclear fuel material, making craters and the boom recorded by seismographs.

It's unclear how much nuclear hardware is real, such as ICBM missiles, or the 'bombs' on carts you see soldiers wheeling around in photos such as this one - are these out-of-shape people really soldiers, or just actors? Tough women handling these heavy bombs! Supposedly the USA has made over 70,000 nuclear weapons, with less than 15% of them still existing - how they were 'dismantled', is another foggy 'secret'.

The terror of nuclear weapons achieved many ends. Trillions of taxpayer funds diverted in 10 'nuclear weapons' nations, straight into pockets of arms profiteers and their political friends. Stoking 'strategy of tension' fright of foreign 'enemies' who can supposedly kill your entire society and the whole world, and this well before 'climate change'.

Nuclear weapons fear was created, just as much of the Western world walked away from Christianity after WW2. With people no longer fearing 'eternal hell', alleged 'science' supplied this new fear of total destruction and horror to serve as a psychological control tool. A perfect oligarch game.
 
Last edited:
Well you can argue the first county to get agi wins. But then do we all lose.

AI been in use for a while anyway like anything it just gets more advance.

No idea what the next thing will be.

I don't think anyone will use a nuke on anyway to be honest because the resources are too great to lose.

Drones is an interesting one.. But what seems more insane is the cost to down them. Why not go back to the old flak cannons using metal scrap ie the shotgun of the sky seems to make more sense for drone swarms than a 2m+ missile to down a 200 dollar drone
 
Flies? Yeah. Tons of em.
Haha, nice way to dodge the answer!
Post automatically merged:

Well you can argue the first county to get agi wins. But then do we all lose.
I used to watch videos of people trying to create it. Absolute hippies and nutters.

For example they produce this type of crap https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCog

I think they're smart and delusional.

First of all, why develop something that'll annihilate the creator of it? It's Black Mirror.
 
I think EMP type weaponry are more likely than a pure destruction type.

No electronics, especially with everyone switching over to EV etc.

You cannot call first responders, military would need to verify wtf is happening locally.

You would collapse banking transactions locally, and general inconvenience which costs more, since you would need to replace most if not all electronics.
 
I think EMP type weaponry are more likely than a pure destruction type.

No electronics, especially with everyone switching over to EV etc.

You cannot call first responders, military would need to verify wtf is happening locally.

You would collapse banking transactions locally, and general inconvenience which costs more, since you would need to replace most if not all electronics.
Reminds me of some computer games.

Now that's what I call a real cyber attack.

Just attack directly. Stop hacking wordpress sites.
 
Back
Top