Resolved White mode @User blends in with normal text

[Rem]

So uh
yes white mode
flashbang mode


vs


could us white them users have this changed
Purple would probably be good !

 

[God]

imagine still using Dark Mode
GENESIS 1:3 & @God said, Let there be light: and there was light

 

[back2form]

I've not even changed to white theme for more than 2 mins..

Since, I love this Default Dark Theme ❤

 

[Spy]

So uh
yes white mode
flashbang mode

View attachment 222
vs
View attachment 223

could us white them users have this changed
Purple would probably be good !

@back2form is everywhere

 

[back2form]

@back2form is everywhere

Maybe absent in somewhere...

 

[roydan]

While we're at it, the gradient username @Rem and @UnusualSubstance doesn't play well with a cover image:

 

[Octavia]

While we're at it, the gradient username @Rem and @UnusualSubstance doesn't play well with a cover image:
View attachment 226

Such a Hot Rod

 

[UnusualSubstance]

While we're at it, the gradient username @Rem and @UnusualSubstance doesn't play well with a cover image:
View attachment 226

Too much KNAWLEDGE.

Tai Lopez would be happy.

 

[Zwielicht]

While we're at it, the gradient username @Rem and @UnusualSubstance doesn't play well with a cover image:
View attachment 226

It's clearly a feature!

But yeah, that's an odd issue. I saw someone else on the Xenforo discussion forums mention having a similar issue, but the fix provided in the update didn't seem to work on this one.

I'll add it to the to-do to try making some adjustments to them.

So uh
yes white mode
flashbang mode

View attachment 222
vs
View attachment 223

could us white them users have this changed
Purple would probably be good !

@Impulse will work on it.

 

[Impulse]

I swear I fixed this before - think the update might have changed something in style properties.

Tagged usernames are now a nice mellow green colour to set them apart.

 

[Zwielicht]

I swear I fixed this before - think the update might have changed something in style properties.

Tagged usernames are now a nice mellow green colour to set them apart.

It's because we jumped straight into downloading the update instead of putting it on a test site whilst the entire team from every department spends two months checking everything.

I can practically hear, "yew didn chack ova de UP-Dayts like yew shoulda, roight".

Glad to be out of that hellhole.

 

[UnusualSubstance]

It's because we jumped straight into downloading the update instead of putting it on a test site whilst the entire team from every department spends two months checking everything.

I can practically hear, "yew didn chack ova de UP-Dayts like yew shoulda, roight".

Glad to be out of that hellhole.

That other forum is like a cruise ship: a simple update would take 3-5 business months to implement, and said cruise ship slowly turns, but it takes 5 miles to do so.

Maybe it'll end up like the Costa Concordia.

Of course, a new update will probably be available by then.

Rinse and repeat.

Office Outlaw?

We're a HECKEN JETSKI, BABY. LET'S GOOOOO.

We need to turn? We do so in 30 seconds.

No test site, slap on the gassssssss!

 

[Rem]

@Impulse @Zwielicht

Bumping this

This is the @ Tagging on Profiles

vs

 

[Impulse]

@Impulse @Zwielicht

Bumping this

This is the @ Tagging on Profiles
View attachment 289
vs
View attachment 290

I think we just had an outdated template that needed to be fixed. Is the issue still there?

 

[Rem]

I think we just had an outdated template that needed to be fixed. Is the issue still there?

@Yes

 

[Impulse]

@Yes
View attachment 291

OK, sorry I misunderstood what you were saying. For some reason, tagged usernames appear that colour specifically in profile post replies, but not profile posts themselves....

Sigh... I have no idea why it's being like this. Let me see what the issue could be.

 

[Rem]

OK, sorry I misunderstood what you were saying. For some reason, tagged usernames appear that colour specifically in profile post replies, but not profile posts themselves....

Sigh... I have no idea why it's being like this. Let me see what the issue could be.

Looks like it's only replies
the original profile post works as intended

 

[Impulse]

Looks like it's only replies
the original profile post works as intended
View attachment 295

Yeah, I noticed that, which is why I was confused at first.

I fixed this by extending the criteria for colour. The profile post replies should all show the correct colour now.

However, the fix I did also made a lot of other usernames throughout the forum show up in the same colour. I think it looks good, but let me know if there are any areas where usernames are hard to read.

 

[Rem]

Yeah, I noticed that, which is why I was confused at first.

I fixed this by extending the criteria for colour. The profile post replies should all show the correct colour now.

However, the fix I did also made a lot of other usernames throughout the forum show up in the same colour. I think it looks good, but let me know if there are any areas where usernames are hard to read.

That works
Any chance.. there no way to make it look like their actual color?
For example, @Impulse should show up as White
while @Rem is yellow

 

[Impulse]

That works
Any chance.. there no way to make it look like their actual color?
For example, @Impulse should show up as White
while @Rem is yellow

I can look into that -- it would be a neat feature to have.